According to documents released on August 31, more than 50 Biden administration officials across a dozen agencies have been involved with efforts to pressure Big Tech companies to crack down on alleged misinformation.
The documents show that senior officials in the U.S. government, including White House lawyer Dana Remus, deputy assistant to the president Rob Flaherty, and onetime White House senior COVID-19 adviser Andy Slavitt, have been in touch with one or more major social media companies to try to get the companies to tighten rules on allegedly false and misleading information on COVID-19, and taken action against users who violate the rules.
For example, after Biden said that Facebook was “killing people” by not combating misinformation effectively in July of 2021, an executive at Meta reached out to Surgeon General Vivek Murthy, a Biden appointee, to say that government and Meta teams met after the remarks, “to better understand the scope of what the White House expects from us on misinformation going forward.”
The same executive later wrote to Murthy saying, “I wanted to make sure you saw the steps we took just this past week to adjust policies on what we are removing with respect to misinformation, as well as steps taken to further address the ‘disinfo’ dozen,” including removing pages linked to the group.
The White House publicly pressured social media companies to take action against a group that officials dubbed the “disinformation dozen,” which a nonprofit claimed were producing the bulk of “anti-vaccine misinformation” on the platforms. Also in July 2021, Murthy said, “Facebook hadn’t done enough to combat misinformation.”
According to one of the messages, Flaherty, director of digital strategy for the White House, told Slavitt and others in April 2021 that White House staff would be briefed by Twitter “on vaccine misinfo,” with the meeting including “ways the White House (and our COVID experts) can partner in product work.”
In another exchange that year, a Department of Treasury official working on “mis, dis, and Mal-information” told Meta workers that the deputy Treasury secretary wanted to talk about “potential influence operations.”
Meanwhile, U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Director Jen Easterly, sent a text in February 2021 to another agency official that she was “trying to get us in a place where Fed can work with platforms to better understand the mis/dis trends so relevant agencies can try to prebunk/debunk as useful.”
The documents were par of a preliminary production in a lawsuit levied against the government by the attorneys general of Missouri and Louisiana, later joined by experts maligned by federal officials.
“If there was ever any doubt the federal government was behind censorship of Americans who dared to dissent from official Covid messaging, that doubt has been erased,” Jenin Younes, a lawyer with the New Civil Liberties Alliance who is representing some of the plaintiffs in the case,” said in a statement. “The shocking extent of the government’s involvement in silencing Americans, through coercing social-media companies has been revealed,” Younes added.
Due to the involvement of so many officials and agencies, plaintiffs said the massive pressure campaign amounted to a “Censorship Enterprise.”
Government lawyers only identified 45 officials at five agencies; the Department of Homeland Security, CISA, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Murthy’s office, who communicated with social media companies on misinformation, although documents they produced showed others were involved including officials at the Census Bureau and the Departments of Treasury and State.
Responses from the Big Tech companies also revealed more officials involved with the effort.
Meta has disclosed that at least 32 federal officials, including top officials at the White House and the Food and Drug Administration, were in communication with it about content moderation. Many of the officials weren’t identified in the response by the government.
YouTube disclosed 11 officials not divulged by the government and Twitter identified 9 officials, included senior officials at the State Department.
Plaintiffs said, “The discovery provided so far demonstrates that this Censorship Enterprise is extremely broad, adding, “It rises to the highest levels of the U.S. Government, including numerous White House officials.”
Also, the FBI wasn’t identified even though the agency recently said, after Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg revealed that the bureau reached out before the 2020 election, that it routinely issues communications to social media companies.
Plaintiffs told the judge overseeing the case that more discovery is needed to uncover the full breadth of the pressure campaign.
In a statement by Louisiana Attorney General Jeff Landry, a Republican, “When the federal government colludes with Big Tech to censor speech, the American people become subjects rather than citizens. Landry concluded, “The U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) must not be allowed to hide behind the veil of executive privilege, especially when there is already compelling evidence that the people’s government colluded with these social media companies to suppress their right of free speech.”
We appreciate our friends at Patriot Alerts for content in this article.
You can support The DC Patriot at the links below
FaithNFreedoms.com – Our Apparel Brand
PreparewithMatt.com – Long lasting food from our friends at My Patriot Supply
Patreon.com/MattCouch – Support our work on Patreon
Cash App: https://cash.app/$TheDCPatriot