Police Officer Fired for Donating to Rittenhouse Defense FIRES Back After Not-Guilty Verdict, Wants Job Back, Files Grievance

As you may recall, the liberal media leaked the names of those that donated to the Kyle Rittenhouse defense fund, and several people were harassed and even fired, including some police officers and firefighters. Now one is fighting back.

Virginia police officer, Lieutenant William Kelly was fired in April after the liberal hack site The Guardian released his name and the names of other police officers and public officials who donated to Rittenhouse’s legal defense fund.

Kelly reportedly donated $25, and used his department-issued email address when making the donation.

Kelly also left the following message for Rittenhouse.

“God bless. Thank you for your courage. Keep your head up. You’ve done nothing wrong. Every rank and file police officer supports you. Don’t be discouraged by actions of the political class of law enforcement leadership.”

Norfolk city manager Chip Filer terminated Kelly, and then left this egregious and hate filled drivel of a message about the firing, “His egregious comments erode the trust between the Norfolk Police Department and those they are sworn to serve.”

Now we’re hoping that Kelly sues the hell out of the city.

If that wasn’t enough Norfolk Police Chief Larry Boone suggested that Kelly’s comments eroded trust between police officer and the public. What a couple of spineless beat jellyfish, eh America?

Kelly was a 19-year-veteran of the police department as well, and now he wants his job back. Hell, at this point he should be the new Chief of Police, and these clowns sued and fired that were behind his dismissal.

He spoke to the Daily Mail in an interview on Friday after the Rittenhouse verdict, explaining why he thought Rittenhouse was innocent.

“Everything I’m saying is just my personal opinion. I’ve been a homicide detective, a violent crimes investigator for years. I have a background. I watched the video of the shooting and I’d seen the video of the journalists of Mr. Rittenhouse before the shooting and the protesters before the shooting and I thought it painted a pretty clear picture that Mr. Rittenhouse had a very strong claim for self-defense,” Kelly explained.

“I was very surprised when he was charged soon after the shooting with these murders and the shooting of the third victim,” he added.

By donating to Rittenhouse’s defense fund, Kelly said he was promoting the foundational American ideal that everyone is innocent until proven guilty.

“I was interested in giving him the chance to defend himself in front of a jury. I know that lawyers are expensive, and it’s hard sometimes to get the message out there. I wanted to make sure that he had the means necessary to make his claim in court,” Kelly told the Daily Mail. “It mattered. The comments I made, my belief that he has a strong claim for self-defense was a personal opinion. I didn’t want my city or police department to be associated with it, so I chose to donate anonymously.”

Kelly also said his opinion about the Rittenhouse case had “no impact on my ability to do my job as a police officer,” and should not have resulted in his termination.

“This is America. You can agree with your neighbors and other people in your community and you can disagree with them,” Kelly said. “Just because someone has a different opinion than you, it doesn’t mean you should destroy their lives, take their job away.”

“If I had a different opinion and I donated to a fund for the victims and made comments about how Mr. Rittenhouse was a murderer, nobody would have cared or tried to get me fired,” Kelly added.

When Kelly was fired, he was just 10 months away from his pension being vested. If he does not get his job back, he will never see the pension that he worked nearly 20 years to earn.

Kelly has filed a grievance seeking to be reinstated.

In that grievance, Kelly accused Boone of hypocrisy for attending a Black Lives Matter protest in uniform last May after the murder of George Floyd.

The grievance states:

My dismissal reflects inconsistency, unfairness and discrimination by the City of Norfolk in regard to speech by members of the Norfolk Police Department. I engaged in speech which was private and anonymous but became public through no fault of my own, and which, when made public, upset a small number of vocal people for a very short time. The Chief of Police of the Norfolk Police Department, in contrast, has been permitted to parade through the streets of Norfolk, wearing his Norfolk Police Department uniform, holding a “Black Lives Matter” sign while marching with a crowd protesting against police and law enforcement…

Kelly told the Daily Mail he hopes for a hearing over his grievance by the end of January, but said his case could be resolved before then, especially considering the outcome of the Rittenhouse trial.

Thanks to our friends at The Blaze and The Daily Mail for contributing to this article.

5 1 vote
Article Rating

You Might Like

Leave a Reply

1 Comment
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
David E Gignac
David E Gignac
4 days ago

In Norfolk they need to reinstate Lt. Kelly with back pay and he needs to refuse and file a wrongful termination lawsuit.

They need bumper stickers supporting this 19 year veteran cop.

Support the BLUE especially when the Police Chief slanders a 19 year veteran cop.