Corrupt Nevada Secretary of State, Refuses to Investigate Election Fraud

I’ve been working on election fraud in Nevada for years, but it was always hampered by a legion of do-nothing RINOs that not only refused to fix the fraud that was happening…but actively enabling it to get worse, including enacting ballot harvesting, mail-in ballots to everyone dead or alive, and no voter Id or proper signature checking. Much like Arizona, Nevada has raging issues with no-Trumper Republicans that aren’t actually conservatives at all. We call them Harry Reid Republicans or RINOs, and much like the McCain Republicans of Arizona….they do nothing but take up space and hamper conservative causes, all the while ruining what should be a natural checks and balances system. Barbara Cegavske is one of these RINOs (Republican in Name Only, if you’re wondering what that stands for.) She’s so bad, that even her own party sanctioned her not doing her job and allowing all this fraud. During the 2018 midterms, GOP candidates were doing pretty well, then all of a sudden at the end of the night a magical “blue wave” rolled in (sound familiar) and Republicans lost every state seat….except one. That’s right, apparently Democrats came in droves to vote down the line blue last minute EXCEPT for the Republican SOS Barbara Cegavske, for her they made one magical unexplained exception. I’m sure it had *nothing* to do with the fact that Nevada’s been using Dominion Voting since 2006 and no one currently holding office is likely holding it legitimately. How else do you think a tax owing, criminal living, 4-time arrested radical leftist thug (Aaron Ford) got elected to Attorney General? Election fraud on this scale can’t occur without the collusion of all the major state offices…and if you think they’re going to investigate and indict themselves, let me tell you they’re not.

Over $3 million dollars of Mark Zuckerberg’s charity money cannot be accounted for in Maricopa Country…another county currently amid an election audit revealing fraud. The same goes for Nevada, where $2.3 million of Zuck bucks state nothing more than they were used for “planning and operationalizing safe and secure election administration” during the COVID-19 pandemic….and nothing more.

To this day, Nevada’s Republican Secretary of State Barbara Cegavske has yet to explain why counting was “stopped” but allowed to continue after observers were sent home, why security cameras aren’t allowed to be used to protect the process, how several precincts in Nevada had over 100% voter turnouts, why Election Czar Joe Gloria prevented poll watchers from properly observing and told them to ignore ballot discrepancies, and most importantly….what the hell she was doing when she was caught forwarding private voter roles to an intelligence company in Pakistan…one of the many countries accused of hacking our election.

Despite everything I’ve just stated, Barbara Cegavske revealed this week that she found “no evidence to support the state GOP‘s claim of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 general election.” Did she actually define what she considers enough to be “widespread?” No, and how could she? She openly admits in her own statement that her and her staff “didn’t have the time” to properly research the evidence, evidence brought forth by people who seem to care a lot more about voter fraud than she does. It’s interesting she says she didn’t have the time, when 360 News Las Vegas obtained Cegavske’s calendar for October and November and uncovered that actually had barely anything scheduled other than a few calls or speeches that wouldn’t even take up her day.

Is there some other job she has to do right now that’s more important than looking into the most suspicious election we’ve ever seen in our life? She even admits her office barely put in the working by stating they only did a minuscule 125 hours of work on election fraud, which let me tell you…is NOTHING when it comes to the average time I spend doing research for an article just like this one. Instead of bothering to at least do the same amount of work others did, she lazily took a small sampling, looked them up on a computer, came up with a statistic, and called it a day. We don’t even know if the few samples she chose were cherry-picked either. So how does she explain all the irregularities researchers and other people found? Right off the bat in her statement she basically accuses them of just “not knowing” what they’re looking at. Yea well, at least they’re looking unlike you, Babs.

I know these things aren’t easy to read and they do that on purpose, so let me break it down just how shady Cegavske was in some her father poorly attempted “explanations.”

A) Illegal Alien Votes: In Nevada, illegal aliens are allowed (for some reason) to apply for driver’s licenses at the DMV, when they do they are automatically registered to vote unless they happen to catch that they need to opt out. Aside from muddying up voter registration polls in general, this policy also makes felons out of unknowing immigrants who don’t catch where they need to opt out and subsequently accidentally end up committing a felony. This set up for failure is brought to you by Cegavske herself. In her official statement she concluded that 4,057 illegal immigrants were registered this way AND showed they voted in the 2020 Election. Sounds like a problem to me, but Cegavske dismisses it away as “only” 5% of illegal aliens voted this way and they could have maybe been naturalized along the way (are you guessing?) so it’s not a big deal. She also states that since you can’t ask for proof of citizenship when people register to vote (um, why?) she’s just going to take their word for it if that they’re legal (you’re going to take the word of people already committing a crime by being here?) Can you just take my word for it that I’m going to pay all my taxes too, since that’s how you think it works? I get a feeling the SOS wasn’t expecting anyone to thoroughly examine the fine print in her statement.

B) 2,479 people managed to mail back their ballots and vote, despite having permanently changed their address to somewhere “out of state” more than 30 days before the election: Cegavske goes on to explain that these people simply might have went off to college, or maybe joined the military, or had their mail forwarded to the state they now live in (exactly, they don’t live here.) She uses words like “may” because she didn’t actually look into any of it whatsoever. She’s literally just throwing out ideas to explain it away. She even admits that mail-in ballots make it easy to skirt around residency requirements, but that it doesn’t “warrant any further investigation.” Oh good for you not doing any work and deciding you don’t need to do any more. Who let these mail-in ballots get sent out to everyone dead or alive again? Oh yea, you. I don’t know about you, but if I were in charge of the fate of the entire country, I’d do a little bit more research than random “guesses.”

C) 1,506 people voted after they died: While this seems like an easy (albeit time consuming) thing to solidly prove, Cegavske comes to the conclusion that only 10 people voted after they died after referring to the Vital Statistics Registrars (yea, I’ve never heard of it either) where funeral homes report deaths to someone, or something. Keep in mind that the people who put forth this data cross-referenced 2020 voter polls with the Social Security Administration Master Death File, Consumer Data Vendors, Public Obituary Data Matches, and the Credit Bureau itself. You’ll notice as this continues, Cegavske just doesn’t care to put any actual work into this.

D) 42,284 ballots are duplicate votes/people that voted twice: Cegavske details how if they’re double votes than she can safely assume that at least half of them are valid, so technically only only 21,142 votes are in question (Oh are they? I’m guessing it was too hard to put someone at the office on that too.) She goes on to explain that the issue “may merely have been duplicate registration or other data entry errors.” “May?” So you didn’t actually do any research work on the other half of these numbers either, just more lazy assumptions and guesses. Cegavske also goes on to explain to us mere plebes, that we could never prove/disprove of people voted twice on our own anyway because the information is simply “not publicly accessible.” So basically the only person that can do a thorough investigation, is Cegavske…and she is refusing to do so. Man, it must be nice to be in charge of covering up your own crimes.

E) 8,842 voters were purported to be illegally registered at commercial properties: Cegavske yet again refusing to do a full investigation, checks a sample of only 369 of those addresses….on a computer, checks personally on none of them, finds 9 that are definitely businesses with no living space, ignores checking the rest, deems it too low to care about, and calls it another day. Gee, I guess it’s not like this is important or anything.

But wait there’s more, after sampling only 369 out of 8,111 that were purportedly sent to non-addresses, they discovered 95% of them were a valid address….they just “don’t receive street delivery from the USPS.” Oh?They don’t receive Mail? SO HOW DID THESE PEOPLE GET THEIR BALLOTS DELIVERED TO THEM? Doesn’t matter, because Cegavske comes to the conclusion yet again, that none of this requires any further investigation. Yea, I bet.

There’s more, but honestly there’s two greater issues involving fraud in Nevada that aren’t even mentioned in her statement.

F) First off, there’s a very illegal issue in the way the ballot signatures were matched…as in they were never matched at all. Instead of visually confirming that signatures were at least similar (which is the legal requirement,) Cegavske invested in “machines” that would match the signatures…machines that were set to such a low standard of matching that almost all of the signatures always went through. I can’t even get my own signature to match itself half the time, that’s why this is a problem easily solved by asking for some sort of government ID when people vote. Can’t have that though, it’s just too secure. Nevermind the fact you need an ID to validate every other single transaction in this country…except certify ballots. Interesting how only people accused of fraud don’t want to check ID’s.

G) The other issue I think should be the largest concern to everyone, is the well documented, known corruptness of Dominion Voting Machines themselves and their very easily manipulatable software. I was permanently suspended off Twitter from my 250k+ verified account for posting about this specific kind of electronic voter fraud….as were other high profile accounts including General Flynn, Sydney Powell, Mike Lindel, Tracy Beanz, and of course President Trump himself. We didn’t post threats, or nudity, or calls to violence…we were calling out Dominion Software for corruption, and questioning both the Democrats and Republicans (yes, it’s both establishment parties) that had gotten paid by Dominion to push forward and subsequently award the company multiple, lucrative state contracts to operate our elections.

I would seriously have to make one of those conspiracy maps with the red string to properly explain all the direct ties between this software, election rigging, George Soros, and yes, even the Clintons. You can read about that “here.” But let me sum it up the best way I can in layman’s terms:

“Smartmatic Voting Systems” created the sub company “Sequoia” which was then bought out by “Dominion Voting System” ….no matter how many hands change, it’s all the same software. This software has a built in design to allow fractionalized voting, for instance in the corporate setting they might have it set so the President of a company’s vote counts as one and 1/2 votes and the shareholders votes only count as a third, or something like that. So in theory (and this has actually already happened) someone could get into the software through WiFi, and apply this algorithm feature to any election to manipulate it. You can even set it so this algorithm automatically gives a candidate the exact winning percentage you desire by simply picking up votes that have already occurred and electronically altering them and moving them over. I spent two hours watching a professional mathematician explain this, he managed to painstakingly (at least for me) reverse engineered the peculiar election abnormalities in Georgia and actually managed to figure out the exact algorithm they used. He goes on to prove it by showing no matter what numbers you put in…you’ll get the same winning percentage everytime, it’ll just keep adjusting itself and “robbing” from other precincts. Remember how numbers were deleted by the thousand from Trump and mysteriously added to Biden on live TV several times on election night? That’s because the live updates caught some of these electronic “adjustments” in the act. Now, this method of tabulation manipulation only works if you have enough ballots to adjust, if one candidate is winning in a landslide somewhere…you’re going to need to stop everything and find a way to inject more ballots….oh wait, does that sound familiar now? Remember that “stoppage of the count” that happened almost simultaneously across all the Battleground states that Trump happened to be leading in on election night? It was unprecedented and yet we were never given a reason why. We were also never given an explanation as to why counting magically resumed in the dead of night after poll watchers were sent home, or why almost all the votes that got injected during this time were entirely for Biden. We were also never given an explanation as to way extra cases of ballots were hidden and counted after hours on security footage in Georgia, or showed up in vans in the early hours when counting was “over” in Michigan. That might also explain how so many counties across the country (like the 7 out of 9 in Michigan) had more ballots turned in than they had possible voters.

This is not a “right wing conspiracy” theory as the media would desperately want you to believe. Smartmatic itself came out and publicly stated that their software was used to rig the Venezuelan election by creating over a million “ghost votes.” Just a few years ago both CNN, NBC, and HBO all did documentaries about how these machines were easily riggable and could fall into the wrong hands (they were worried about conservatives at the time.) Even former Democrat presidential candidates Elizabeth Warren and Amy Klobouchar came out publicly against Dominion for endangering the democracy of our election system as recently as 2019…no wonder the DNC had to go with the less likable Kamala Harris, their statements would have gotten thrown back at them if they refused an audit. Apparently everyone knew these machines were an issue, up until the powers that be used them to win themselves, then suddenly it become just another “conspiracy theory.” This same software has been accused of rigging elections in Korea by China…because the scariest part about this technology is that any hacker, any bad actor, any foreign country can manipulate this software through an internet connection. Which judging from this raw data of where our election data was sent to….there was a helter skelter of countries (Germany, Italy, Russia, and China) that interfered because they did not want an America-first president like Trump to come to power, they wanted Biden. Why? Well look at everything Biden’s done….almost everything hurts Americans and our economy while making other countries richer. Why did our stimulus tax money meant for us, go more toward overseas? Why are illegals getting more benefits than our small businesses and veterans? So know you know “why” other countries wanted to rig our election, now you know “how” they could do it on such a massive scale, now you know “what” the media was doing by refusing to report on fraud and suspending accounts that talked about it….now what are YOU going to do about it?

As a Nevadan, I do not trust the “word” a lazy, corrupt, and questionable Secretary of State….I demand a full 3rd party audit of the 2020 election, and I want it NOW.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

You Might Like

Leave a Reply

0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments