Spread the love

The discredited January 6th Committee, comprised entirely of Democrats, had a narrow focus from the beginning: to pin the blame for the Capitol riot on President Donald Trump. Despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, they ignored any facts that didn’t fit their narrative and refused to investigate other leads.

Unsurprisingly, a committee made up of anti-Trumpers couldn’t be expected to be impartial. However, in their single-minded pursuit of one man, they may have lied to the American people about other individuals, according to a report by Just The News.

One such person is Stefan Passantino, a former White House attorney for President Trump and attorney for Cassidy Hutchinson, a witness for the Committee. Passantino has now taken legal action against the Committee members.

In his lawsuit, he alleges that the Committee “manufactured and promoted a false narrative against him without ever contacting him, interviewing him, or providing him with notice of the claims against him.” He further claims that the Committee violated his due process rights by not giving him an opportunity to respond to the allegations.

The lawsuit also alleges that the Committee exceeded its constitutional authority by conducting an interview with Hutchinson under false pretenses, without Passantino’s knowledge or consent. The Committee then interfered in the attorney-client relationship between Passantino and Hutchinson, generated a false narrative about that relationship, and promoted that false narrative to further a political agenda. The lawsuit names Representative Liz Cheney and others as defendants.

According to the lawsuit, the Committee spun an “outrageous tale” to media outlets, including CNN, about Passantino’s supposed efforts to obstruct their investigation. This was done without any input or interview from Passantino. The lawsuit claims that the Committee purposely and maliciously interfered in the attorney-client relationship between Passantino and Hutchinson.

The Committee’s false narrative about Passantino was based on Hutchinson’s testimony, in which she claimed that Passantino had coerced her into misleading the Committee about how much information she knew. However, it later emerged that this claim was false and that Hutchinson had committed perjury on the stand.

The Committee then attempted to do damage control by claiming that Passantino had instructed her to lie. This was a blatant attempt to shift the blame away from Hutchinson and onto Passantino.

It’s clear that the January 6th Committee was more concerned with pushing a political agenda than with uncovering the truth. By manufacturing false narratives and ignoring evidence that didn’t fit their narrative, they did a disservice to the American people. Passantino’s lawsuit is a necessary step in holding the Committee accountable for their actions. It’s time to stop the political games and start getting to the truth.

Thanks to our friends at The DC Enquirer for contributing to this article.

Support The DC Patriot at the links below 

FaithNFreedoms.com – Our Apparel Brand

COUCHLIKESGOLD.COM

PreparewithMatt.com – Long lasting food from our friends at My Patriot Supply 

Patreon.com/MattCouch – Support our work on Patreon 

Cash App – Support Matt Couch/DC Patriot on Cash App

By

6 thoughts on “Former Trump Lawyer Sues Defunct Jan 6 Committee for Foster ‘False Narrative’”
  1. I get paid between $145 and $395 an hour online. I heard about this job 3 months ago and after joining it I easily made $23,000 with no online skills. Just try it on the companion page.

    .

    .
    For Details—————————➤ https://EarningDoors1.blogspot.Com

  2. Weathers believes that Anheuser-Busch made a mistake in partnering with Mulvaney and exposing who they are.

  3. But with President Trump back in the White House, he will restore true justice in America and save our Republic from becoming a Soviet-style Third World country.

  4. So far this year, I’ve earned $64,000 USD while studying full-time and working online. I just discovered an internet business opportunity and have been exploiting it ever since. It’s quite user-friendly, and I’m just thankful that. I only recently become
    .
    .
    Aware of it—————————————>>> http://duzzweb.blogspot.com/

  5. ●Google pay 95145$ consistently my last pay check was $9452163 working 10 hours out of every week on the web. My more young kin buddy has been averaging 15k all through ongoing months and he works around 24 hours consistently. I can’t confide in how straightforward it was once I endeavored it out.This is my primary concern…g­­­o t­­­o t­­­hi­­­s si­­­te ho­­­me media tech t­­­a­­­b f­­­or m­­­or­­­e d­­­et­­­a­­­il thank you GOOD LUCK……………….. https://www.apprichs.com

  6. ●Google pay 95145$ consistently my last pay check was $9452163 working 10 hours out of every week on the web. My more young kin buddy has been averaging 15k all through ongoing months and he works around 24 hours consistently. I can’t confide in how straightforward it was once I endeavored it out.This is my primary concern…g­­­o t­­­o t­­­hi­­­s si­­­te ho­­­me media tech t­­­a­­­b f­­­or m­­­or­­­e d­­­et­­­a­­­il thank you GOOD LUCK……………….. https://www.apprichs.com

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: